Image Credit: Pixabay.com
We all know that each 100% vote costs your 2% voting power, and every 24 hours, your voting power restores 20%. This means that you can vote 10 times at 100% one day and the voting power will remain the same the next day.
The question comes: Given a 30 days period, and approximately 60% voting power at the day 1, is there a much bigger gain to restore your voting power to 100% (wait 2 days) ?
I always thought there is not much difference in terms of total curation earnings until today.. I wrote a VBScript that reveals the truth.
The first strategy, just vote 10 times 100% per day every day in the 30 days’ period. Assume 10K SP 100% gives 1 SBD. And suppose the 10 votes are done in a row (the VP restored during upvotes can be ignored)
1 | Function Strategy1(ByVal sp, ByVal vp, ByVal days) |
The second strategy, let’s wait a few days before the VP is restored, adding a parameter rest
in the unit of days.
1 | Function Strategy2(ByVal sp, ByVal vp, ByVal days, ByVal rest) |
In my case, I have 10K SP so let’s assume these values:
1 | steempower = 10000 |
So the simulation gives:
1 | WScript.Echo ("Strategy 1 Max Income = " & Strategy1(steempower, votingpower, daysofcuration)) |
This is a BIGGGGGGGGG difference! The lower voting power, longer periods, the bigger difference! So…. you might consider letting your upvoting robot take a few days’ rest…
Correction @tumutanzi told me my understanding was not exactly right. The 2% loss is to the current VP, so instead of vp = vp - 0.02
the correct version is vp = vp * 0.98
.
So the correct version to emulate steemit curator is (you can vote 11 times per day)
1 | Function Strategy1(ByVal sp, ByVal vp, ByVal days) |
And this gives totally different results,
1 | steempower = 10000 |
It indicates there is NOT much difference at all!
1 | Strategy 1 Max Income = 279.67590316366 |
Image Credit: Pixabay.com
虽然说小鱼的点赞策略就是喜欢的点,因为SP少点赞收益没有多少区别,但是现在 @justyy 已经有超过1万的SP 了,所以今天想了一下这么一个问题。
我们都知道,一次100%点赞消耗能量 2%,一天恢复20%的能量相当于一天中你可以点满10次。那么问题就是,假设30天时间内,你一天点10次,最大收益是多少?
为了简化分析模型,我们假设1万SP能量全满点赞收益是1 SBD,那么如果初始能量只有60%,我们是不是需要等恢复了90%甚至是全满后再点这样效果会好一点呢?
我本来以为没啥区别,直到今天晚上无聊随便写了段VBScript代码来分析,结果让我很吃惊。
第一种策略,从第一天就开始点满10次,假设这10次都是一下子点完,两次点赞间的能量恢复可以忽略不计,那么我们可以用以下代码来模拟:
1 | Function Strategy1(ByVal sp, ByVal vp, ByVal days) |
第二种策略,多加了一个参数,先休息几天,恢复恢复能量,然后再点。
1 | Function Strategy2(ByVal sp, ByVal vp, ByVal days, ByVal rest) |
我有1万SP,那么假定这些值。
1 | steempower = 10000 |
跑一下程序看看结果:
1 | WScript.Echo ("Strategy 1 Max Income = " & Strategy1(steempower, votingpower, daysofcuration)) |
太意外了,你的VP越低,统计时间越长,效果差别就越大,OMG,还是先让机器人缓几天吧,至少点赞比率先降一降,等恢复了差不多了这样每天保持10次点赞 点完能量保持在80%左右,这样是最优的。
错啦错啦 @tumutanzi 告诉我,我的理解有问题, 2%的损失不是 vp = vp - 0.02
而是针对当前VP能量,所以应该是vp = vp * 0.98
.
程序更正一下,每天可以点11次,点10次能量满的话就会浪费:
1 | Function Strategy1(ByVal sp, ByVal vp, ByVal days) |
假定以下值:
1 | steempower = 10000 |
这结果显示,没啥区别,不得不说,这系统设计的真巧妙。是我没弄清楚,丢人了(捂脸)
1 | Strategy 1 Max Income = 279.67590316366 |
> @justyy 是 https://justyy.com 的博主,在 @tumutanzi 大哥 的介绍下加入 STEEMIT,写些帖子挣些小钱养家糊口。
@justyy 也是CN 区的点赞机器人,对优质内容点赞,只要代理给 @justyy 每天收利息(年化率14.6%)并能获得一次至少2倍(VP 200%+)的点赞,大鱼 @htliao 都加入了这个计划(530 SP)表示支持。
Steemit Upvoting Strategy
SteemIt SP Delegation Tool 简易SP代理工具
Steemit 在线工具和API接口
SteemIt Tools and APIs
This page is synchronized from the post: Voting Power Matters? 能量需要恢复满么?