为什么帖子上看到的收入和收到的奖励不符?(写给像我一样的新人朋友)

今天收到一个作者奖励:0.073SBD , 0.036SP
rewards.png

看了一下那个帖子的收益总额,发现作者收益是$0.15,和我收到的0.073SBD,0.036SP 怎么加都算不到$0.15.
payout.png

试着按SBD和STEEM的市场价格算:0.073x1.9+0.036x1.8=$0.2035
价格和看到的$0.15也不一样。

到底是怎么回事呢?搜索了一些帖子,发现这里面和feed price和我选择的50%/50%收入分配有关。

Feed price/喂价,就是最近3.5日Steem的评价市场价格。
50%/50%收入分配就是帖子的奖励按照50%SBD/50%SP分配。

如果选择50%/50%收入分配,奖励的构成就是:50%SBD+50%SP(确切的应该是所得到的SP的市场价值)

回到我看到的奖励$0.15, 为什么我会收到0.075SBD和0.036SP呢?
因为$0.15=$0.075+$0.075, 第一个$0.075因为Steemit的设定1SBD=$1, 所以$0.075也等于0.075SBD。
第二个$0.075是所得到的SP的市场价格。$0.075/2.07(目前feed price)=0.036SP,0.036的SP价值$0.075.
最终奖励得到0.075SBD和0.036SP (目前市场价值$0.2035)

如果选择100%SP奖励会得到多少奖励呢?
$0.15/$2.07=0.0724 SP(目前市场价值$0.13)
得到的奖励比选择50%/50%得到0.2035还要少很多,这就是为什么写文章要选50%/50%.


This page is synchronized from the post: 为什么帖子上看到的收入和收到的奖励不符?(写给像我一样的新人朋友)

South Korea Planning to Formally Allow ICOs

Regional news sources report South Korea’s financial authorities are working on legislation to formally allow initial coin offerings (ICOs) in an effort to appear more welcoming to the larger financial technology community.
south+korea.jpg

South Korea Plans to Make ICOs Legit

Online news source The Korean Times reported this week “Financial authorities have been talking to the country’s tax agency, justice ministry and other relevant government offices about a plan to allow ICOs in Korea when certain conditions are met,” it quoted an anonymous source as insisting.

Initial coin offerings are an increasingly popular way to finance projects, and are often much less cumbersome and expensive than their namesake, initial public offerings, which involve gaggles of lawyers just to navigate legal hurdles. ICOs have also come under increasing scrutiny around the world, however, due to investors being scammed out of millions.

금융위원회 Financial Services Commission (FSC) is the Republic’s main financial regulatory body, directing the country’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). FSC’s crypto regulator, Kang Young-soo, hasn’t committed to ICO liberalization publically, telling the National Assembly: “There are many speculating about the possibility of allowing ICOs. The FSC has acknowledged a third-party view regarding the issue, but there’s nothing that we can say officially at the moment. Yes, we have to have plans on how to advance blockchain-related technologies and effectively regulate crypto-trading. This is a separate issue.”

Still, The Times reports, “The financial authorities are preparing a plan to allow initial coin offerings (ICOs), digital token-based fundraising rounds, for domestic investors, to advance blockchain-based technologies, according to sources familiar with the issue.” It would be a major turnaround for the crypto-crazed nation, as regulators in Fall of last year outright banned ICOs for residents.

Perhaps tellingly, “Despite this, the administration has yet to implement the ICO rule and hasn’t forced companies to return ICO funds. It also continues to let local investors put money into foreign ICOs and digital currency exchanges operating within the country,” The Times reveals. South Korea plays a very large role in the overall fiscal health of the speculative cryptocurrency market, and plays a hand in dictating the price of coins and general sentiment.

“Various scenarios such as the imposition of value-added tax, a capital gains tax, or both on trade,” another anonymous source is quoted, “and the collection of corporate tax from local cryptocurrency exchanges, as well as the initiation of authorized exchanges with licenses are being discussed,” adding transparency between ministries and banks will allow capital to be better monitored.

In business-oriented countries like South Korea, they understand outright prohibitions on mechanisms such as ICOs mean those startups and capital will move to friendlier climes, and thus starve the region of badly needed growth. Instead, more politicians are at least considering embracing innovation by folding them into existing regulatory structures.

Sources: bitcoin.com, koreatimes.co.kr


This page is synchronized from the post: South Korea Planning to Formally Allow ICOs

一分钟了解霍金干了啥,然后再发朋友圈

3/14你们的朋友圈肯定被霍金刷屏了。如果有朋友问你,霍金都干了啥?你是尴尬了还是尴尬呢?
看完混子哥今天更新的科普漫画,瞬间让你不尴尬。

对混子哥的漫画有兴趣的朋友可以关注他的微信公众号hey-stone
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image


This page is synchronized from the post: 一分钟了解霍金干了啥,然后再发朋友圈

抄底一波Steem

之前一直在另外一个社区写文章,但是每次写虚拟货币的内容的时候,讨论的人就少了,大家都觉得这些虚拟货币都是虚幻的/虚拟的,怎么会是未来。直到发现了steemit这个社区,大家都看好steem,看好虚拟货币的未来,这样才有了归属感。

之前在3.5刀的时候入了一波,这次steem跌破2刀又入了一波。准备好每月定投的准备了~
Steem here I come!

wallet.PNG


This page is synchronized from the post: 抄底一波Steem

【吐槽大会】朋友圈的套路

曾经何时,社交网络还是QQ的天下。经常看到好友装扮自己的空间和发布自己的心情。直到微信的横空出世,从此以后很少人会在QQ空间发布心情了。追其根源,微信的朋友圈的一大特点就是:你看不到你好友的朋友的留言,除非你们有共同好友留言。

你是不是经常看到朋友圈发现有些好友发布心情,然后会自己留言说什么“谢谢大家关心,我很好”之类的话,看了留言你就会觉得像是好多人在关心她似的。

今天无聊逛了一下QQ的好友圈,发现下面这条心情:
thumbnail.jpg

发布者和留言者都是同一个人。这条心情总共浏览11次(我贡献了3次),没有任何的留言,没有任何人点赞。发布者这是在干嘛?你是不是走错地方了?

如果同样一条心情发在微信朋友圈就不一样了,大家看到留言,就会觉得她很热门,很有钱,等等。

这个大概就是所谓的套路吧。

最后说一句,大家发布心情的时候记得选好社交平台哦!不然下一个被吐槽的就是你了!


This page is synchronized from the post: 【吐槽大会】朋友圈的套路

接@softmetal的主题:炒币学到的最有意思的英语是什么?

@softmetal 聊到“炒币学到的最有意思的英语是什么?”
他认为最有意思的英文是To the moon, 而我认为最有意思的英文应该是HODL

HODL的由来是一位网友在留言的时候因为太激动,把HOLD写成了HODL,大家为了嘲笑他,就开始使用HODL,并给了一个全称:Hold On for Dear Life.
中文翻译就是“执币之手,与币偕老”。
HODL也是币圈目前最常用的英语,毕竟行情不好,大家只能HODL。。。

大家还有哪些有意思的炒币英文分享?

hodl.PNG
最后说一句,希望大家和另外一半“执子之手,与子偕老” 不要HODL!


This page is synchronized from the post: 接@softmetal的主题:炒币学到的最有意思的英语是什么?

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×